The value of clinical examination versus magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of meniscal tears and anterior cruciate ligament rupture.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of clinical examination versus magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in diagnosing meniscal and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) pathology. TYPE OF STUDY: Prospective, longitudinal study. METHODS: Between August 2001 and December 2001, we prospectively evaluated 50 consecutive patients (37 male, 13 female) with 65 pathologies of medial meniscal tears, lateral meniscal tears, and/or ACL rupture. The average preoperative period for the patients was 5 weeks (range, 5 days to 5 months) and their mean age was 22 years (range, 12 to 42 years). After initial clinical examination, the same sports medicine fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeon (10-year practice profile of 100% sports medicine) evaluated the MRI of the patients and performed their arthroscopic procedure. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated comparing clinical examination, MRI, and arthroscopic evaluation. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference between MRI or clinical examination in diagnosing medial or lateral meniscal tears or ACL tears ( P >.05). The accuracy of the clinical examination and MRI evaluation was equal for diagnosing meniscal tears and ACL ruptures. CONCLUSIONS: A well-trained qualified surgeon can safely rely on clinical examination for diagnosing meniscal and ACL injuries. Clinical examination is at least as accurate as MRI in the skilled orthopaedic surgeon's hand. MRI should be reserved for more complicated and confusing cases. The routine ordering of an MRI scan of the knee before examination by a well-trained orthopaedic surgeon is not recommended. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, diagnostic.

Patient outcomes following T-Fix meniscal repair and a modifiable, progressive rehabilitation program, a retrospective study.

INTRODUCTION: This retrospective study presents clinical patient outcomes following meniscal repair using T-Fix devices and a modifiable, progressive rehabilitation program. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-two patients (35 males and 17 females) with a mean age of 26.7 years (range 13-50 years) representing all of the patients who underwent arthroscopic meniscal repair (43 medial meniscus, 12 lateral meniscus) over a 3-year period by the same surgeon (D.C.) (55 menisci) participated in this study. Thirty-two of the patients (62%) had an associated ACL tear. All patients with an ACL tear underwent reconstruction (tibialis anterior allograft) at the time of meniscal repair. All meniscal tears were located in either the red-red zone (29) or the red-white zone (26). All patients who underwent meniscal repair participated in a modifiable (based on meniscal tear size, type, and location) progressive rehabilitation program. Operative notes and photographs were reviewed to identify the meniscal tear location, tear type, tear length, and the number of T-Fix devices used. Orthopedic clinic and physical therapy reports were also reviewed for postoperative range of motion, knee joint effusion, knee joint pain, McMurray test findings, and single-leg broad-jump test performance (90% bilateral equivalence goal). The average postoperative clinical follow-up period was 10.3 months (range 4-24 months). RESULTS: Most (22/23, 96%) patients who underwent meniscal repair alone displayed excellent results. All patients (32/32, 100%) who underwent combined ACL reconstruction-meniscal repair displayed excellent results. During an acute event such as a sudden directional change while running or contact with another player, 5 of these patients re-injured their meniscus at the repair site in conjunction with tearing the reconstructed ACL at 12+/-3 months following the index surgical procedure. Each of these 1-2 cm meniscal tears had been previously repaired with two T-Fix devices. CONCLUSION: The T-Fix device used in combination with a modifiable progressive rehabilitation program produced excellent clinical patient outcomes among this patient group.

Triceps tendon ruptures in professional football players.

BACKGROUND: Distal rupture of the triceps tendon is a rare injury, and treatment guidelines are not well established. HYPOTHESIS: Football players with triceps tendon ruptures will be able to return to their sport with minimal functional deficits. STUDY DESIGN: Uncontrolled retrospective review. METHODS: Twenty-one partial and complete ruptures of the triceps tendon were identified in 19 National Football League players over a period of 6 years. Team physicians retrospectively reviewed training room, clinical, and operative notes for each of these players. RESULTS: Most of the injured players were linemen. The most common mechanism of injury was an eccentric load to a contracting triceps. Seven players had prodromal symptoms prior to injury, and 5 had received a cortisone injection. Eleven elbows with complete tears underwent surgical repair. Of 10 players with partial tears, 6 healed without surgery. One player suffered a subsequent complete tear requiring surgery, and 3 with residual pain and weakness underwent surgical repair following the season. Two surgical complications occurred, both requiring a second operation. All of the players but 1 returned to play at least one season of professional football after their injury. CONCLUSIONS: Partial triceps tendon ruptures can heal without functional deficit. Surgical repair for complete ruptures generally produces good functional results and allows return to play.